Summary of Law: All persons who possess specific wild animals should obtain a permit for every single animal they possess. In the exotic pet context, some owners have argued that regulations depriving them of their pets constitute a taking of their animal for the public welfare, and that they must receive just compensation for their loss. In addressing the Rhoades’ second claim, that hazardous dog owners received preferential remedy more than exotic pet owners, the court held that the city could rationally take into account exotic pets to be more of a concern than dangerous dogs.
The Animal Protection Institute, an animal welfare group, catalogues attacks or escapes involving exotic pets. Born Free opposes the keeping of wild or exotic animals as pets, challenges the exotic pet industry and trade, and campaigns for national and international legislation to decrease and exactly where achievable end this practice. President Calvin Coolidge kept such a selection of pets that some considered the White House a zoo throughout his time in workplace.
This section discusses a few state regulations that are neither complete bans nor licensing systems, but that do govern private ownership of exotic pets. For a additional discussion of these problems, see Bridget M. Kuehn, Wildlife Pets Produce Ethical, Practical Challenges for Veterinarians , Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, offered at (July 15, 2004). Even though the story was just not too long ago found, it all began in 1969 in London, when Rendall and Bourke identified an energetic three-month-old lion cub for sale at Harrod’s department store and brought him house to reside in the basement of the furniture shop at which they worked.
If your state, city or county does not prohibit private possession, contact your state senator and representative or your city and county council members and urge them to introduce legislation banning possession of exotic animals. Some animals ought to stay unpopular as pets due to the fact they don’t fit the lifestyles of most individuals, as opposed to dogs and cats. Seldom are there ever incidents like these from animals that are frequently banned with out question such as wild felines, canines, and other largely uncommon pets.
This case demonstrates the hesitancy of courts to turn out to be second-order administrators of exotic pet regulations. In the context of exotic pet regulations, owners have contended that the seizure of their pets constituted a deprivation of home with no adequate notice or opportunity to be heard, thus violating the due procedure clause. Coatimundis and ringtail cats are also closely related exotic pets that are comparable. The Massachusetts director of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife also issues a list of exempted species for which no permit is necessary. Each of these protections have been utilized in fighting exotic pet regulations.